Conflictual Peacetime International Politics
نویسنده
چکیده
Affirmative answers are given to two questions of international politics: Do the parsimonious postulates of structure theory imply any mode of behavior for states, as claimed by the theory of neorealism? Does a principle of the harmony of interests exist for states, as asserted by idealist theories? Answers emanating from an n-person game theoretic model, which portrays states as security maximizing agents that allocate their conflictual resources against each other at peacetime, can be summarized in a “principle of the harmony of security.” In a world without a hegemon, if all states are cautious and ambitiously maximize their individual securities, then the world will be in a mode of bilateral-equilibrium in which all states are equally insecure. If two or more strong states vigorously pursue their individual securities, then a bilateral-equilibrium is most plausible, irrespective of whether the rest of the states are irrational, modest, or ambitious. ∗ Bilkent University, Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Bilkent, Ankara, 06800 Turkey phone: 90-312-2901259, fax: 90-312-2664192, email: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Politics and Power in Global Health: The Constituting Role of Conflicts; Comment on “Navigating Between Stealth Advocacy and Unconscious Dogmatism: The Challenge of Researching the Norms, Politics and Power of Global Health”
In a recent article, Gorik Ooms has drawn attention to the normative underpinnings of the politics of global health. We claim that Ooms is indirectly submitting to a liberal conception of politics by framing the politics of global health as a question of individual morality. Drawing on the theoretical works of Chantal Mouffe, we introduce a conflictual concept of the political as an alternative...
متن کاملExtensions of Power Transition: Applications to Political Economy
This is a paper about theory in political economy terms and political economy in theoretical terms. It unifies power transition theory and applies it to the central questions that now confront political economists. Will trade wars emerge as the security challenge declines? What are the economic effects of integration, trade and growth? How will economic patterns influence international power re...
متن کاملHow does war shock the economy?
Wartime periods have frequently been treated as natural macroeconomic experiments, but the international pooled time series evidence presented here shows that the literature has overemphasized the experience of the United States and the United Kingdom. Wars fought exclusively on foreign soil do have marginally higher real output growth than peacetime periods, but real growth during all other wa...
متن کاملReligion and Politics: A Troubled Relationship in a Volatile World
This chapter pertains to exploring the political resurgence of religion, seeking to answer the pressing question of first, what accounts for religious revival in the age of globalization and second, what accounts for the political success or failure of religious movements, mostly in terms of exerting political influence on their domestic spheres and arenas. In order to answer these questions, t...
متن کاملNeither ideologues nor agnostics: alternative voters' belief system in an age of partisan politics.
How do Americans organize their political beliefs? This article argues that party polarization and the growing prominence of moral issues in recent decades have catalyzed different responses by different groups of Americans. The article investigates systematic heterogeneity in the organization of political attitudes using relational class analysis, a graph-based method for detecting multiple pa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013